by Sandra L. Gottlieb, Esq., Senior Partner, SwedelsonGottlieb, Community Association Attorneys
Traditionally, absolute liability had been imposed on one who diverts stream water out of its natural channel and onto adjacent lands. Under current rules of law, if both the downstream property owner and upstream property owner have acted reasonably, the natural watercourse rule imposes the burden of stream-caused damage on the downstream property owner (Locklin v. City of Lafayette (1994) 7 Cal.4th 327, 337). In the worst of circumstances, a party who is found to have acted unreasonably in causing damage to a downstream property is liable only for the proportion of damage attributable to his conduct (Locklin, at 337). Note, however, that the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid injury to adjacent property through the flow of surface waters may result in liability by the upper to the lower landowner. However, there is no strict liability, and even the court in Locklin stated that it is unreasonable to have a rule of strict liability in this regard (Locklin, at 352).
If your association is experiencing water runoff issues, such as those discussed above, please contact our attorneys so we can analyze your specific facts and provide you with a legal opinion and a proposed plan of action as it relates to same.
Contact Sandra Gottlieb at slg@sghoalaw.com.