Articles Posted in Davis-Stirling Act

A Soon To Be State Law May Do More Harm Than Good Steven Shuey, PCAM, CCAM

Homeowner Associations exist in common interest developments to manage the community.  This management includes providing for the maintenance of the common areas as well as administration.  In many communities, this can mean thousands of dollars per month in regular monthly costs.

Associations pay their monthly bills with funds collected from owners through maintenance assessments, also known as a maintenance fee or dues.  Without this regular recurring income, funds would not be available to meet the association’s obligations.

Homeowner Legislation Poised to Hurt More Than Help-CAI/CLAC’s Press Release on AB 2598 The seven million Californians who live in homeowners associations will have to pay higher monthly dues, thanks to legislation passed in the last hours of the legislative session. Assembly Bill 2598 (Steinberg) again takes up the use of foreclosure to compel payment of delinquent assessments – a practice used in less than 0.007 of collections processes. Just last year California implemented a law (Kehoe, AB 2289) that provides comprehensive protections specific to dues collections, including extensive notification, payment plans and wait periods. These protections rank as the strongest nationwide. That’s why members of homeowners associations oppose AB 2598. Senior Sam Dolnick of La Mesa, CA, said the legislation will do more harm than good. “Many seniors in our association live on fixed incomes and they cannot afford to pay more. When placed in a squeeze, they will have to pay higher assessments to make up for those who may purposely not pay their assessments until they reach the $2,500 threshold.” Homeowner association resident and president of the Wildwood Association in Sacramento Lisa Lindsey said, “Assessments are the lifeline of homeowners associations. For smaller communities like mine, we would be crippled if 20 of our 137 residents were late on assessment dues. Our insurance alone costs more than $85,000.” Homeowners aren’t the only ones hurt by AB 2598. The legislation brings business disincentives for builders and lenders, who are central to responding to the state’s population growth. • Developers will not sell units if new buyers can willingly avoid paying the dues needed to maintain the property. • Banks and lenders will stop loaning money to developers and homeowner associations because their loan security is impaired. “We have thousands of community associations in California as clients. This law will have a negative impact on the ability of associations to secure financing for needed renovations and repairs,” said John Smith, Senior Vice President, U.S. Bank Homeowner Division. For More Information: www.responsibleneighbors.com

We have been asked for more information on why Steinberg’s AB2598 is bad law. AB 2598 is one of two pieces of legislation proposed following the foreclosure earlier this year on a senior citizen couple in Calaveras County. Proponents of this legislation, which would make it more difficult for associations to collect assessments, suggest that what happened in Calaveras County is only an example of a rampant problem. They have not referenced any other similar problems; assessment foreclosure abuses are not rampant; there is no problem with the current system other than the fact that it compels homeowners who are delinquent to pay their assessments.

This legislation is a poor response and overreaction to a situation which is not a rampant problem. We say overreaction because of the following:

1. Currently, if a homeowner is delinquent in the payment of assessments, the association has the ability to record a lien securing that obligation. Of course, the association must follow the proper procedures, send out the appropriate notices, and wait the appropriate time. However, if that lien is not recorded, the homeowner can transfer title to the unit without paying their assessment obligation. It is the lien with the possibility of foreclosure that compels homeowners to timely pay their assessments.

They did it. The legislature passed one of the two foreclosure bills we warned you about previously. Senator Denise Ducheney’s (Democrat – San Diego) SB1682 did not move forward but Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg’s (Democrat – Sacramento) AB2598 passed the Senate although we are told that there was some confusion during the voting on this bill.

We are advised that an hour later Steinberg’s AB 2598 was passed on a split vote in the Assembly after a “robust debate” which addressed the negative impact this litigation would have on responsible homeowners who do timely pay their assessments. We are advised that 27 out of 80 assembly members voted “no” or abstained from voting on the first round, further indicating that there was (and remains) serious concerns with the bill.

AB2598 has gone to Governor Schwartznegger for his action. Governor Schwartznegger until the end of September decide whether to sign the bill into law or veto it. AB 2598 is bad law and we want it vetoed. The Governor needs to hear from all of us as soon as possible.

The Wall Street Journal recently reported on the effect the sub-prime crisis is having on many community associations. While the crisis is not a problem in some areas of the country, in California it is a affecting many associations budgets, as many boards did not anticipate or address the potential for bad debt when they adopted their budgets. In an article entitled “